trees are for u.bmp (400566 bytes) Friends of the Mau Watershed (FOMAWA)  desktop.jpg (4935 bytes)desktop.jpg (4935 bytes)desktop.jpg (4935 bytes)desktop.jpg (4935 bytes)desktop.jpg (4935 bytes)desktop.jpg (4935 bytes)Welcome to the Friends of the Mau Watershed website

Commercial On-farm Forestry ] Schools Projects ] Improved Stoves ] Tree Nurseries ]

 

 

 

[Home]  About us ] Our Management ] [ Projects ] Publications ] Support Us ] Gallery ] Contact Us ]

Government Commercial Forestry

 Much of the Government's commercial forestry land within Mau has been lost having been allocated and titles issued.Hundreds of hectares were felled in the mid 1990s and have not been replanted.In 2002, the Forestry Department did some replanting to a very poor standard.There has been no follow up, and unless the few trees that are there are felled and a fresh start made, the eventual crop will produce little. There was no good reason to ban the felling of commercial plantations apparently in the mistaken belief that this would help to save the indigenous forest. If this ban had not been imposed AND the mature stands had been auctioned then the complaint that there were insufficient funds to replant would have been invalid, for the timber would have been sold for much higher prices thus bringing cash to the coffers of the Forestry Department.The ban resulted in many mills around Mau not getting the timber they needed, and most of them have closed. The off cuts which were available to the locals as firewood and building materials do not exist, and much scavenging takes place on river banks etc which should be protected. Around eighteen thousand jobs have been lost in the saw mills.The fact is that the land available to the Kenya Forest Service, successor to the Forestry Department, is much less than it was thirty years ago, and that coupled with the substantial backlog in replanting means that the Government is not going to be able to meet the demand for timber. Today forest land in Kenya is just over 2%. In these circumstances an "aware" Government would ask what else could be done.Its priorities would be to lease its forestry land to private investors, and introduce policies which would encourage planting on Private Farms.  It has done neither of these.  Much of the timber available in the market in Nairobi is podo and cedar which has come from within the Indigenous forest either stolen or from excisions.Inevitably the demand for, and price of this, has escalated as timber from commercial forestry becomes in ever shorter supply. But this 'supply' of timber from the Indigenous Forests is almost exhausted, and if the Government is firm in its resolve to protect what remains of the Mau this kind of timber will not  be available in future.Thus commercial plantations will be under greater pressure. Meanwhile the Government's policies, which could more appropriately be described as knee jerk decisions without any real thought as to what would be appropriate, act as a disincentive to the farmer to grow trees for commercial purposes on his land.

Kenya Government forestry

a. Government Commercial Forestry

Kenya Government forestry 2

b. Government Commercial Forestry

FOMAWA comercial forestry

c. FOMAWA Commercial Forestry

The photos (A & B) above show the standards of the Government's forestry taken on 14th July 2009. Photo C shows the excellent standard achieved on private farms under FOMAWA's guidance.

This area (A & B) was felled around 1995 and was fallow till 2007 when it was planted with cypress with unsatisfactory results.  Replanting was done a second time the following year.  Survival is not more than 15%.

The old trees, relics of planting done some thirty years ago, are overdue for felling.   The 'pruning' is a disaster


                                                     @copyright 2010 friends of the mau watershed. All rights reserved